[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908172032500.2782@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:34:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
cc: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clocksource changes in 2.6.31 - possible regression
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:15:54 -0700
> john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > The behavior you describe where you can't switch to the TSC, may be due
> > > > to the TSC disqualification code marking it as non HRT compatible
> > > > (again, I need to double check). While I'm not sure that's really
> > > > correct, as the TSC is fine for HRT, in this case on your box, the TSC
> > > > has been marked as unstable (likely due to being unsynced on old AMD SMP
> > > > systems). There is a real chance that the timekeeping code on your
> > > > system could see the TSC go backwards, calculate a negative time
> > > > interval, and then end up hanging.
> > > >
> > >
> > > TSC was alway stable on this box, and worked fine. There was no
> > > message in log about TSC instability. The change was bisected
> > > down to that one commit.
> >
> > But just to clarify, the TSC was never selected as the default
> > clocksource on the box either, right?
>
> correct.
>
> I am okay with turning it off on boot command line for my tests,
> but it might be an issue for other users.
Can you please provide a full dmesg of pre 31 and the output of
/sys/.../available_clocksources before you switch to TSC ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists