[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908172342400.2782@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:52:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] irq fixes for 2.6.31
Linus,
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Please pull the latest irq-fixes-for-linus git tree from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git irq-fixes-for-linus
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > tglx
> >
> > ------------------>
> > Thomas Gleixner (1):
> > genirq: Do not wakeup irq thread from __setup_irq() and set action->irq
> >
> >
> > kernel/irq/manage.c | 3 +--
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> This is not what I get when I pull. Instead I get the "genirq: Prevent
> race between free_irq() and handle_IRQ_event()" commit that I thought we
> agreed wasn't correct.
I have no idea what went wrong this time. I force pushed the branch
and pulled it back on a test machine to compile and test boot. The
test machine still has the correct sha1 for that branch while
master.kernel.org did not. I probably pushed out some other branch
between the point where I sent the pull request and the time you
pulled, but I can not find any hint in my bash history which would
explain why it wreckaged the irq-fixes-for-linus branch.
Just double checked that it is pushed out to git://.... as well.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists