[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090817230654.GC16222@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:06:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: randy.dunlap@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
nhorman@...driver.com, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] trace_skb: fix build when CONFIG_NET is not
enabled
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:37:36 -0700
>
> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> >
> > Fix trace_skb_sources build when CONFIG_NET is not enabled:
> >
> > kernel/built-in.o: In function `probe_skb_dequeue':
> > trace_skb_sources.c:(.text+0xd9152): undefined reference to `init_net'
> > trace_skb_sources.c:(.text+0xd9188): undefined reference to `dev_get_by_index'
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>
> Applied, thanks Randy.
... but these are the wrong patches, they should be removed or
reverted and redone properly.
It's not just about keeping kernel/trace/* changes in the tracing
tree (which we can relax on-demand given agreement), it's that
these patches are also _wrong_ and we cannot relax anything about
that.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists