[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A88ED25.2040306@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:39:49 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] lock_dep: Fix missing entries in /proc/lock_chains
Two entries are missing in the output of /proc/lock_chains.
One is chains[1]. When lc_next() is called the 1st time, chains[0] is
returned. And when it's called the 2nd time, chains[2] is returned.
The other missing ons is, when lc_start() is called the 2nd time, we
should start from chains[@pos-1] but not chains[@pos], because pos == 0
is the header.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/lockdep_proc.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
index 0c39f18..84c6b1e 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@ static void *lc_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
else {
chain = v;
- if (*pos < nr_lock_chains)
- chain = lock_chains + *pos;
+ if (*pos - 1 < nr_lock_chains)
+ chain = lock_chains + (*pos - 1);
else
chain = NULL;
}
@@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ static void *lc_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
if (*pos == 0)
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
- if (*pos < nr_lock_chains)
- return lock_chains + *pos;
+ if (*pos - 1 < nr_lock_chains)
+ return lock_chains + (*pos - 1);
return NULL;
}
--
1.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists