[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090817.180323.253692704.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tim.bird@...sony.com
Cc: r.schwebel@...gutronix.de, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new ipdelay= option for faster netboot
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:35:01 -0700
> Tim Bird wrote:
>> See the definitions of CONF_PRE_OPEN and CON_POST_OPEN
>> in net/ipv4/ipconfig.c
>>
>> They are set to ridiculously long values. In my experience,
>> you can cut them down considerably with no dangerous side
>> effects (but I haven't asked the network guys about the
>> possible downsides).
>
> It turns out that others have seen this delay. Simon
> Arlott recently posted a patch to make the delay avoidable
> at boot time from the kernel command line.
>
> See http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/31678/
"Rediculiously long" is a relative term.
I have card/switch combinations that take up to 10 seconds to
negotiate a proper link.
So what's there now is actually a quite agressive setting.
And BTW, discussions about stuff like this belong on
netdev@...r.kernel.org, which has been added to the CC:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists