linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert netlink ABI change to gnet_stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:21:24 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Michael Spang <mspang@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert netlink ABI change to gnet_stats_basic

On Sunday 16 August 2009 19:36:49 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> In 5e140dfc1fe87eae27846f193086724806b33c7d "net: reorder struct Qdisc
> for better SMP performance" the definition of struct gnet_stats_basic
> changed incompatibly, as copies of this struct are shipped to
> userland via netlink.
> 
> Restoring old behavior is not welcome, for performance reason.
> 
> Fix is to use a private structure for kernel, and
> teach gnet_stats_copy_basic() to convert from kernel to user land,
> using legacy structure (struct gnet_stats_basic)

Are you sure that the packed structure is actually an advantage
for performance? On architectures that do not have unaligned stores
in hardware, the compiler will generate highly inefficient code
for accessing packed variables, in order to avoid alignment exceptions.

It would need some more measurements, but I'd guess that 

struct gnet_stats_basic_packed
{
       __u64   bytes __attribute__ ((packed, aligned(4)));
       __u32   packets;
};

would give significantly better code on those architectures than
your version, while still giving you the 12-byte size.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/