linux-kernel - completely hide parts of the partition table from Windows?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:22:30 +0200
From:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Andries Brouwer <aeb@....nl>
Subject: completely hide parts of the partition table from Windows?

The BIOS on my laptop clips disk capacities to 128GB. There's no BIOS
update or BIOS setup option to fix this. Passing libata.ignore_hpa=1
allows the Linux kernel to access larger disks, so Linux does work Ok
with larger disks.

However, the laptop dual-boots Windows (for work-related stuff), and
Windows has a major problem: if any entry in the msdos partition table
refers to a sector above the BIOS 128GB limit, the Windows kernel
crashes and reboots early in its boot sequence. The type of the
partition doesn't matter, the fact that it describes an area above
the stupid BIOS limit is enough to trigger the crash.

So what I'm looking for is some sub-partition table format with the
following two properties:
1. resides in an msdos partition entry of a type that Windows does
   not inspect (for whatever extended partitions or Apple/BSD/Sun
   stuff that Windows may have been taught to recognize)
2. the locations and sizes of the sub-partitions are NOT limited by
   the parent msdos partition entry

I've looked at the code in fs/partitions/msdos.c, and it seems that
most of the extended/BSD/Sun formats don't give me property #2 above.

The minix and Unixware format parsers look like they ignore the parent
msdos partion entry boundaries, but I'm not sure if that's by design
or just sloppy coding.

Any recommendations? If no existing partition table format is suitable
for my use case then I'm perfectly willing to invent a simple new format
and add the corresponding parser to the kernel.

/Mikael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/