linux-kernel - [PATCH] spinlock: __raw_spin_is_locked() should return true for UP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1250635343-32546-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:42:23 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: [PATCH] spinlock: __raw_spin_is_locked() should return true for UP

For some reason __raw_spin_is_locked() has been returning false for the
uni-processor, non-CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK.  The UP + CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
handles this correctly.

Found this by enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_VM on PPC and hitting always hitting
a BUG_ON that was testing to make sure the pte_lock was held.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
---

Linus, a fix for 2.6.31

 include/linux/spinlock_up.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock_up.h b/include/linux/spinlock_up.h
index d4841ed..2b372e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock_up.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock_up.h
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
 #define __raw_write_unlock(lock)	do { (void)(lock); } while (0)
 
 #else /* DEBUG_SPINLOCK */
-#define __raw_spin_is_locked(lock)	((void)(lock), 0)
+#define __raw_spin_is_locked(lock)	((void)(lock), 1)
 /* for sched.c and kernel_lock.c: */
 # define __raw_spin_lock(lock)		do { (void)(lock); } while (0)
 # define __raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags)	do { (void)(lock); } while (0)
-- 
1.6.0.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/