linux-kernel - Re: abnormal OOM killer message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d760cf2d0908190125y1aa033fcx2ff6ebfcbe54356f@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:55:44 +0530
From:	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc:	Chungki woo <chungki.woo@...il.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	fengguang.wu@...el.com, riel@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: abnormal OOM killer message

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Minchan Kim<minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Chungki woo<chungki.woo@...il.com> wrote:
>>> You means your pages with 79M are swap out in compcache's reserved
>>> memory?
>>
>> Compcache don't have reserved memory.
>> When it needs memory, and then allocate memory.
>
> Okay. reserved is not important. :)
> My point was that 79M with pages are swap out in compcache swap device ?
> Is the number real ?
> Can we believe it ?
>


I would suggest moving compcache related discussion over to
linux-mm-cc AT laptop DOT org
as this might not be of such general interest. I would be glad to
discuss your doubts in detail.

See you over there.

Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/