[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8BD67F.8020007@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:39:59 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] proc: drop write permission on 'timer_list' and 'slabinfo'
Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:36:30AM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>
>> Wu Fengguang wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:08:30AM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> - proc_create("slabinfo",S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
>>>> + proc_create("slabinfo",S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Style nitpick. The spaces were packed to fit into 80-col I guess.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah, I noticed this too, the reason I didn't fix this is that I don't
>> want to mix coding style fix with this one. We can fix it in another
>> patch, if you want. :)
>>
>
> Why not? This don't hurt readability of the patch, hehe.
>
Here we go.
Pekka, could you please also take the patch attached below? It is just a
trivial coding style fix. And it is based on the my previous patch.
Thanks!
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
View attachment "mm-slub_c-style-fix.diff" of type "text/plain" (916 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists