[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0908190505h6da96280xf67c962aa3f5ba07@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:05:19 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Yu, Wilfred" <wilfred.yu@...el.com>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages?
>> page_referenced_file?
>> I think we should change page_referenced().
>
> Yeah, good catch.
>
>>
>> Instead, How about this?
>> ==============================================
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] mm: stop circulating of referenced mlocked pages
>>
>> Currently, mlock() systemcall doesn't gurantee to mark the page PG_Mlocked
>
> mark PG_mlocked
>
>> because some race prevent page grabbing.
>> In that case, instead vmscan move the page to unevictable lru.
>>
>> However, Recently Wu Fengguang pointed out current vmscan logic isn't so
>> efficient.
>> mlocked page can move circulatly active and inactive list because
>> vmscan check the page is referenced _before_ cull mlocked page.
>>
>> Plus, vmscan should mark PG_Mlocked when cull mlocked page.
>
> PG_mlocked
>
>> Otherwise vm stastics show strange number.
>>
>> This patch does that.
>
> Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Thanks.
>> Index: b/mm/rmap.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/mm/rmap.c 2009-08-18 19:48:14.000000000 +0900
>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c 2009-08-18 23:47:34.000000000 +0900
>> @@ -362,7 +362,9 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct pa
>> * unevictable list.
>> */
>> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
>> - *mapcount = 1; /* break early from loop */
>> + *mapcount = 1; /* break early from loop */
>> + *vm_flags |= VM_LOCKED; /* for prevent to move active list */
>
>> + try_set_page_mlocked(vma, page);
>
> That call is not absolutely necessary?
Why? I haven't catch your point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists