[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090819121017.GA8226@localhost>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:10:18 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Yu, Wilfred" <wilfred.yu@...el.com>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:05:19PM +0800, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >> page_referenced_file?
> >> I think we should change page_referenced().
> >
> > Yeah, good catch.
> >
> >>
> >> Instead, How about this?
> >> ==============================================
> >>
> >> Subject: [PATCH] mm: stop circulating of referenced mlocked pages
> >>
> >> Currently, mlock() systemcall doesn't gurantee to mark the page PG_Mlocked
> >
> > mark PG_mlocked
> >
> >> because some race prevent page grabbing.
> >> In that case, instead vmscan move the page to unevictable lru.
> >>
> >> However, Recently Wu Fengguang pointed out current vmscan logic isn't so
> >> efficient.
> >> mlocked page can move circulatly active and inactive list because
> >> vmscan check the page is referenced _before_ cull mlocked page.
> >>
> >> Plus, vmscan should mark PG_Mlocked when cull mlocked page.
> >
> > PG_mlocked
> >
> >> Otherwise vm stastics show strange number.
> >>
> >> This patch does that.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> >> Index: b/mm/rmap.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- a/mm/rmap.c 2009-08-18 19:48:14.000000000 +0900
> >> +++ b/mm/rmap.c 2009-08-18 23:47:34.000000000 +0900
> >> @@ -362,7 +362,9 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct pa
> >> * unevictable list.
> >> */
> >> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
> >> - *mapcount = 1; /* break early from loop */
> >> + *mapcount = 1; /* break early from loop */
> >> + *vm_flags |= VM_LOCKED; /* for prevent to move active list */
> >
> >> + try_set_page_mlocked(vma, page);
> >
> > That call is not absolutely necessary?
>
> Why? I haven't catch your point.
Because we'll eventually hit another try_set_page_mlocked() when
trying to unmap the page. Ie. duplicated with another call you added
in this patch.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists