[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1ocqbgcsi.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:33:17 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: v2.6.31-rc6: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>
> > I'm not certain who I should route this too, but I just had 2.6.31-rc6
> > fall over on me. I don't know how reproducible this will be but
> > I have a full crash dump if someone is interested in looking into this.
>
> Looks like I was wrong. This is appears trivial to reproduce,
> I have just reproduced it two more times in a row. I think
> the problem is pty related.
>
> I was looking into a change in behavior on 2.6.31-rc6 where
> data was being lost, and it appears one variant of my test program
> kills the kernel.
>
> The following program run as an unprivileged user causes a kernel
> panic in about a minute:
>
> aka
>
> while :; do ./KernelTtyTest ; done
>
>
> oops.... It panics my x86_64 machine.....
I guess I forgot to mention that detail. Thanks for confirming this
bug isn't just me.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists