linux-kernel - Re: ATI driver conflict with LOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:08:19 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Bowen <zbw1983@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ATI driver conflict with LOCK_STAT

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:04 +0800, Bowen wrote:
> Hi All:
> 
> 	I just found that I can't compile my ATI driver. I have downloaded a  
> ATI driver from their web site, but I can't compile it successfully,  
> it reported "FATAL: modpost: GPL-incompatible module fglrx.ko uses  
> GPL-only symbol
> 'lock_acquire'",
> 
> 	I found when I close LOCK_STAT, I can compiled ATI driver  
> successfully. And I also try to remove GPL declaration from  
> "lock_acquire, lock_release, rcu_lock_map, lockdep_init_map", I can  
> also use ATI driver. So does anybody meet same problem? Should we  
> remove GPL limitation from those functions in kernel? Or just make  
> ATI driver conflict with LOCK_STAT?

Yay, I broke binary junk, +1 to me!!

Seriously though, use the opensource driver already :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/