lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hiqgipz4x.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:18:06 +0200
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc:	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: nfs: LOCKDEP warning with 2.6.31-rc6

Hi,

my machine got a lockdep warning regarding NFS client on 2.6.31-rc6.
Here is the log:

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.31-rc6-test #12
-------------------------------------------------------
soffice.bin/31490 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}, at: [<f85ea8bb>] nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]

but task is already holding lock:
 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<c0106c5b>] sys_mmap2+0x6d/0xb4

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
       [<c0161b06>] __lock_acquire+0x100e/0x130d
       [<c0161ebc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
       [<c01a2a15>] might_fault+0x69/0x9a
       [<c026d399>] copy_to_user+0x3c/0x127
       [<c01d4427>] filldir64+0xc3/0x108
       [<f85e6270>] nfs_do_filldir+0x383/0x4ad [nfs]
       [<f85e6b4e>] nfs_readdir+0x7b4/0x830 [nfs]
       [<c01d469e>] vfs_readdir+0x76/0xb3
       [<c01d474e>] sys_getdents64+0x73/0xc3
       [<c0102df3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
       [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff

-> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}:
       [<c0161856>] __lock_acquire+0xd5e/0x130d
       [<c0161ebc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
       [<c03af059>] mutex_lock_nested+0x43/0x272
       [<f85ea8bb>] nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
       [<f85e8128>] nfs_file_mmap+0x5e/0x77 [nfs]
       [<c01ab5f7>] mmap_region+0x263/0x40f
       [<c01aba07>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x264/0x2c7
       [<c0106c6f>] sys_mmap2+0x81/0xb4
       [<c0102df3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
       [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff

other info that might help us debug this:

1 lock held by soffice.bin/31490:
 #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<c0106c5b>] sys_mmap2+0x6d/0xb4

stack backtrace:
Pid: 31490, comm: soffice.bin Not tainted 2.6.31-rc6-test #12
Call Trace:
 [<c03ad742>] ? printk+0x1d/0x33
 [<c01606d1>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xaf/0xcb
 [<c0161856>] __lock_acquire+0xd5e/0x130d
 [<f85ea8bb>] ? nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
 [<c0161ebc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
 [<f85ea8bb>] ? nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
 [<f85ea8bb>] ? nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
 [<c03af059>] mutex_lock_nested+0x43/0x272
 [<f85ea8bb>] ? nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
 [<f8609339>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x68/0x82 [nfs]
 [<f85ea8bb>] nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
 [<f85e8128>] nfs_file_mmap+0x5e/0x77 [nfs]
 [<c01ab5f7>] mmap_region+0x263/0x40f
 [<c01aba07>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x264/0x2c7
 [<c0106c6f>] sys_mmap2+0x81/0xb4
 [<c0102df3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38

=======================================================

Indeed this looks like a circular lock dependency since copy_*_user()
invokes mm->mmap_sem mutex lock internally.  (I hit a similar bug in
the ALSA core ago, thus I know it :)

The inode lock in vfs_readdir is killable, so it's not critical,
though...


thanks,

Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ