[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090820121205.GC5448@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:12:05 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for
	vbus_driver objects
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:36:14AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> >> So where is the problem here?
> > 
> > If virtio net in guest could be improved instead, everyone would
> > benefit.
> 
> So if I whip up a virtio-net backend for vbus with a PCI compliant
> connector, you are happy?
I'm currently worried about venet versus virtio-net guest situation, if
you drop it and switch to virtio net instead that issue's resolved.
I don't have an opinion on vbus versus pci, and I only speak for myself.
-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
