linux-kernel - Re: nfs: LOCKDEP warning with 2.6.31-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1250772891.5352.21.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:54:51 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfs: LOCKDEP warning with 2.6.31-rc6

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:18 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > my machine got a lockdep warning regarding NFS client on 2.6.31-rc6.
> > Here is the log:
> > 
> > =======================================================
> > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > 2.6.31-rc6-test #12
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > soffice.bin/31490 is trying to acquire lock:
> >  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}, at: [<f85ea8bb>] nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
> > 
> > but task is already holding lock:
> >  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<c0106c5b>] sys_mmap2+0x6d/0xb4
> > 
> > which lock already depends on the new lock.
> > 
> > 
> > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> > 
> > -> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
> >        [<c0161b06>] __lock_acquire+0x100e/0x130d
> >        [<c0161ebc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
> >        [<c01a2a15>] might_fault+0x69/0x9a
> >        [<c026d399>] copy_to_user+0x3c/0x127
> >        [<c01d4427>] filldir64+0xc3/0x108
> >        [<f85e6270>] nfs_do_filldir+0x383/0x4ad [nfs]
> >        [<f85e6b4e>] nfs_readdir+0x7b4/0x830 [nfs]
> >        [<c01d469e>] vfs_readdir+0x76/0xb3
> >        [<c01d474e>] sys_getdents64+0x73/0xc3
> >        [<c0102df3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
> >        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> > 
> > -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}:
> >        [<c0161856>] __lock_acquire+0xd5e/0x130d
> >        [<c0161ebc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
> >        [<c03af059>] mutex_lock_nested+0x43/0x272
> >        [<f85ea8bb>] nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
> >        [<f85e8128>] nfs_file_mmap+0x5e/0x77 [nfs]
> >        [<c01ab5f7>] mmap_region+0x263/0x40f
> >        [<c01aba07>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x264/0x2c7
> >        [<c0106c6f>] sys_mmap2+0x81/0xb4
> >        [<c0102df3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
> >        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> > 
> > other info that might help us debug this:
> > 
> > 1 lock held by soffice.bin/31490:
> >  #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<c0106c5b>] sys_mmap2+0x6d/0xb4
> > 
> > stack backtrace:
> > Pid: 31490, comm: soffice.bin Not tainted 2.6.31-rc6-test #12
> > Call Trace:
> >  [<c03ad742>] ? printk+0x1d/0x33
> >  [<c01606d1>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xaf/0xcb
> >  [<c0161856>] __lock_acquire+0xd5e/0x130d
> >  [<f85ea8bb>] ? nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
> >  [<c0161ebc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
> >  [<f85ea8bb>] ? nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
> >  [<f85ea8bb>] ? nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
> >  [<c03af059>] mutex_lock_nested+0x43/0x272
> >  [<f85ea8bb>] ? nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
> >  [<f8609339>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x68/0x82 [nfs]
> >  [<f85ea8bb>] nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x72/0xbe [nfs]
> >  [<f85e8128>] nfs_file_mmap+0x5e/0x77 [nfs]
> >  [<c01ab5f7>] mmap_region+0x263/0x40f
> >  [<c01aba07>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x264/0x2c7
> >  [<c0106c6f>] sys_mmap2+0x81/0xb4
> >  [<c0102df3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
> > 
> > =======================================================
> > 
> > Indeed this looks like a circular lock dependency since copy_*_user()
> > invokes mm->mmap_sem mutex lock internally.  (I hit a similar bug in
> > the ALSA core ago, thus I know it :)
> > 
> > The inode lock in vfs_readdir is killable, so it's not critical,
> > though...
> 
> Right, I did a number of patches to split up ->mmap() a while ago (ok, a
> long while ago).
> 
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arch@vger.kernel.org/msg04493.html
> 
> Unless someone sees another way out, we should reconsider these, as this
> warning seems to pop up more frequently.

I'd be fine with that...

Cheers
  Trond

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/