linux-kernel - Re: Atom processor inclusion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200908201433.54785.tobias.doerffel@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:33:49 +0200
From:	Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerffel@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Kelly Bowa <kelly.bowa@...il.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Atom processor inclusion

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 12:50:29 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> Yep, it looked acceptable - Tobias, do you have any
> updates / latest version of that patch?
No - it's still the improved version I posted at the end of May [1]. The 
question is what to do with MODULE_PROC_FAMILY (CORE2 or ATOM) and the mtune-
fallback (generic, i686, ...)?

Regards,

Tobias


[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/374

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)