linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Fix Xen boot with CONFIG_CC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A8D78C1.5070708@goop.org>
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:24:33 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Fix Xen boot with CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR

On 08/20/09 03:06, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> I only need to disable stackprotector for a
>> handful of functions, but unfortunately it looks like it can only be
>> disabled on a per-file basis.
> Pulled into tip:x86/urgent, thanks a lot Jeremy!
>
> Btw., is there any way to turn off stackprotector on a 
> per function basis, a GCC attribute perhaps? That would 
> be preferable to turning it off for all of common.o.


Yeah, its awkward.  But it looks like this patch is not sufficient, so
drop it for now.  I'll send a replacement shortly (though it doesn't
hurt to keep it; I can just generate a delta if that's better).

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/