[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090820182847.GB9282@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:28:47 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>, gleb@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] eventfd: new EFD_STATE flag
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:06:51PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/20/2009 08:55 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>>> While we could argue about this my feeling is that we should drop this,
>>> at least until we can quantify what benefit it has and whether there are
>>> any Davide-acceptable alternatives.
>>>
>>> In the meanwhile, we can let vhost-net support edge-triggered interrupts
>>> only, let qemu terminate those eventfds and convert then to
>>> level-triggered interrupts (which it can then inject using the existing
>>> ioctl). It will keep vhost-net and kvm simpler at the cost of some
>>> performance penalty to guests using level interrupts. These suck anyway
>>> so we'll point users at msi.
>>>
>> I thought the point was to move assigned devices out of KVM?
>>
>
> Grr. Forgot about that.
>
> That's much more important.
Looks like we'll have do with a separate char device or
something?
> --
> I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
> signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists