linux-kernel - Scalability fixes -- 2.6.31 candidate?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090820190941.GA29572@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:39:42 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	prarit@...hat.com, andi.kleen@...el.com,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <m-kosaki@...es.dti.ne.jp>,
	Daisuke Miyakawa <dmiyakawa@...gle.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Scalability fixes -- 2.6.31 candidate?

Hi, Andrew,

I've been wondering if the scalability fixes for root overhead in
memory cgroup is a candidate for 2.6.31? They don't change
functionality but help immensely using existing accounting features.

Opening up the email for more debate and discussion and thoughts.

-- 
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/