| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:50:49 -0600 From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> To: Helge Deller <deller@....de> Cc: John David Anglin <dave@...uly1.hia.nrc.ca>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.anglin@....ca, roland@...hat.com Subject: Re: kernel segv with 2.6.31-rc6 ? On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 23:45 +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > On 08/20/2009 08:55 PM, John David Anglin wrote: > >> The reason seems to be, that something in the newer gcc compilers changed to generate multiple sections all named ".text" for the PCREL17 relocations. > >> Older compilers named those sections ".text.1", ".text.2", ".text.3" and so forth. > > > > GCC has never generated ".text.1", etc, on parisc linux as far as I know. > > Hmm, I don't like to disagree with an gcc-expert like you,but > I did pasted an objdump in my last mail, which shows that gcc did > generated .text.1, .text.2 and so on: > > Sections: > Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn > 0 .text 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000034 2**0 > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE > ... > 4 .text.1 00000000 00000000 00000000 000000b0 2**0 > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE Since this is a relinked object, might it be possible that ld rather than gcc is the culprit? James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists