[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090820034539.GA6847@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:45:39 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
mingo@...e.hu, josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip/core/rcu] Fix rcu_migrate_callback() to allow for
multiple waiters
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:30:45AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The current interaction between rcu_barrier() and CPU hotplug can result
> > in multiple tasks waiting on rcu_migrate_wq: there can be one CPU-hotplug
> > notifier, and, because rcu_barrier() invokes wait_migrated_callbacks()
> > outside of rcu_barrier_mutex, an arbitrarily large number of tasks
> > executing in _rcu_barrier(). This situation could result in hangs,
> > because rcu_migrate_callback() would wake up but one task.
> >
> > This patch addresses this problem by awakening all sleepers.
> >
> > Located-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >
> > rcupdate.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
> > index bd5d5c8..6c59e1b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
> > @@ -211,10 +211,17 @@ void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_sched);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Wake up anyone waiting on migration of RCU callbacks from a CPU
> > + * going offline. There can be only one CPU-hotplug notifier waiting,
> > + * but there can be any number of rcu_barrier() invocations waiting,
> > + * due to the fact that rcu_barrier() does its wait outside of the
> > + * rcu_barrier_mutex.
> > + */
> > static void rcu_migrate_callback(struct rcu_head *notused)
> > {
> > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_migrate_type_count))
> > - wake_up(&rcu_migrate_wq);
> > + wake_up_all(&rcu_migrate_wq);
> > }
> >
> > extern int rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> >
>
> Maybe wake_up_all() is good for readability. But wake_up()
> is enough for the logic.
>
> In wait_migrated_callbacks(), we use wait_event(), The current
> thread is queued as a non-exclusive waiter. And wake_up()
> wakes up all non-exclusive waiter. (We only have
> non-exclusive waiters in the rcu_migrate_wq)
And we even discussed this very point on March 18th!!!
OK, never mind, this patch has no effect.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists