linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] Revert commit 8827c288feb7810185aa7c2e37537202fc709869

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:40:59 -0700
From:	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, bblum@...rew.cmu.edu,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Revert commit
	8827c288feb7810185aa7c2e37537202fc709869

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:13:59PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Li Zefan<lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > As you said, the 2 patches differ just in using different var/func
> > names, so rebasing shouldn't be hard but maybe a bit boring.
> >
> 
> Yes - it's a fair amount of work for no real gain.

So this revert won't introduce a regression for any potential tests?

Cheers,
	-Matt Helsley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/