[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090820151017.2ba95d6e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:10:17 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
balajirrao@...il.com, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter
batch values for stats counters
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:05:28 +1000
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Agreed, the first hunk is dangerous, on the second hunk, I'm not sure
> > about the INT_MAX thing, that's a 4s gap per cpu, that might be a tad
> > much.
>
> Yeah I somehow missed the fact we read it every timer tick. I was hoping
> for an easy fix but I guess we just need to set a reasonable batch size
> at runtime.
>
Could you share contex-switch-test program ?
I'd like to play with it to find out what I can do against percpu counter.
Thanks,
-Kame
> Anton
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists