[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b2b86520908210235l7961410ag74200291c7f8e3a5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:35:33 +0100
From: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@...glemail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13620] acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c
module loaded on some EeePCs
On 8/19/09, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620
> Subject : acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on
> some EeePCs
> Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>
> Date : 2009-06-25 08:31 (56 days old)
> References :
> <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html>
> Handled-By : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33626/
This must have been fixed in -rc6, because someone just complained
about it working again :-).
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/40999/>
I confirmed this on my own EeePC; i2c-i801 is now correctly denied
access to the IO resources claimed by ACPI. Please remove this
regression from your list.
Thanks
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists