[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8DEFED.5090408@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:53:01 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, bblum@...rew.cmu.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] Use vmalloc for large cgroups pidlist allocations
David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:14:00 -0700
>> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hang on. Isn't this why Dave just wrote and I just rush-merged
>>> lib/flex_array.c?
>>>
>>> Was that code evaluated for this application and judged unsuitable? If so,
>>> for what reason?
>> Should it be helpful: I wrote an overview of the flex_array API here:
>>
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/345273/
>>
>> I could format it up for addition to Documentation/ if people want.
>>
>
> It's definitely helpful for this use case, flex array can store 261,632
> pid_t's on 64 bit.
>
flex_array surely can be used here, or implement Paul's proposal:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/15/226
Note both solutions will probably make the output pid list unsorted.
Or maybe we can implement flex_array_sort().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists