[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3d46plcvw.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:44:35 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Walt Holman <walt@...mansrus.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange network timeouts w/ 2.6.30.5
Walt Holman <walt@...mansrus.com> writes:
> Would something like passing a mem=xx cmdline on x86_64 be sufficient to test this?
I think so, though I admit I don't remember using this personally since
the introduction of e820 RAM mapping support.
Dmesg will show if the memory is limited. For the swiotlb to effectively
disable no RAM > 0x100000000 may be used.
But this test isn't IMHO terribly important at this point - the driver
makes invalid use of the DMA API and it has to change. The test could
only explain _how_ exactly does it fail, we already know _why_ it does.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists