linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v6 for 2.6.32] x86: MCE: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A8DFB3F.40309@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:41:19 +0900
From:	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 for 2.6.32] x86: MCE: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer
 as per-CPU ring buffer

Huang Ying wrote:
> Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer for better
> scalability.
> 
(snip)
> ChangeLog:
> 
> v6:
> 
> - Rebased on latest x86-tip.git/x86/mce + x86/tip

Does this mean your patch is based on a local branch you merged?
Why not on tip/x86/mce alone as usual?
What branch are you requesting this patch to be applied to?

Thanks,
H.Seto

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/