[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090821144707.GB16810@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:47:07 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, jiayingz@...gle.com,
mbligh@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing: Move tracepoint callbacks into DEFINE
* Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com> wrote:
> It's not strictly correct for the tracepoint reg/unreg callbacks
> to occur when a client is hooking up, because the actual
> tracepoint may no be present yet. This happens to be fine for
> syscall, since that's in the core kernel, but it would cause
> problems for tracepoints defined in a module that hasn't been
> loaded yet. It also means the reg/unreg has to be EXPORTed for
> any modules to use the tracepoint (as in SystemTap).
>
> This patch removes DECLARE_TRACE_WITH_CALLBACK, and instead
> introduces DEFINE_TRACE_WITH_CALLBACK which stores the callbacks
> in struct tracepoint. The callbacks are used now when the active
> state of the tracepoint changes in set_tracepoint &
> disable_tracepoint.
>
> This also introduces TRACE_EVENT_WITH_CALLBACK, so those events
> can also provide callbacks if needed.
i think something shorter would be nicer, such as:
DECLARE_TRACE_FN
TRACE_EVENT_FN
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists