[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <987943678.21250869504786.JavaMail.root@mail.holmansrus.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:45:04 -0500 (CDT)
From: Walt Holman <walt@...mansrus.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange network timeouts w/ 2.6.30.5
----- "Krzysztof Halasa" <khc@...waw.pl> wrote:
> Walt Holman <walt@...mansrus.com> writes:
>
> > Would something like passing a mem=xx cmdline on x86_64 be
> sufficient to test this?
>
> I think so, though I admit I don't remember using this personally
> since
> the introduction of e820 RAM mapping support.
> Dmesg will show if the memory is limited. For the swiotlb to
> effectively
> disable no RAM > 0x100000000 may be used.
>
> But this test isn't IMHO terribly important at this point - the
> driver
> makes invalid use of the DMA API and it has to change. The test could
> only explain _how_ exactly does it fail, we already know _why_ it
> does.
> --
> Krzysztof Halasa
Just got a chance to test this for confirmation. When limiting the RAM to 2GB, the patched driver appears to work OK.
-Walt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists