[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8EC3BD.3000107@xenontk.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:26:45 +0530
From: David John <davidjon@...ontk.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, erikm@...linux.org,
vince@...likki.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Mailing lists have moved
On 08/21/2009 09:05 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 09:27 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Russell no longer wants to maintain the mailing lists, so with his
>>> blessing I have set up replacements at lists.infradead.org.
>>
>> Can you help us understand why the existing linux-arm@...r.kernel.org
>> list is not used for this?
>
> Russell didn't want to do that, so I offered an alternative solution
> preserving the three separate lists (l-a, l-a-kernel, l-a-toolchain).
>
Would it be too much to ask that linux-arm@...r be used for ARM kernel
development, with the other two lists at infradead? Maintaining multiple
kernel development lists was one of the problems mentioned, with people
unsure as to which list to subscribe to and having to subscribe to both
lists in case mails were posted to the vger list.
Maintaining a _single_ kernel mailing list would be ideal.
Regards,
David.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists