linux-kernel - Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic in acpi_ps_complete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A8F1081.3020803@suse.de>
Date:	Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:24:17 +0400
From:	Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
To:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	len.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic in acpi_ps_complete_op

Eric Paris пишет:
> On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 00:12 +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This should be handled by abe1dfab60e1839d115930286cb421f5a5b193f3.
> 
> And yet I'm getting it from linux-next today.
> 
> So you are apparently failing the in_atomic_preempt_off() test but
> succeeding in your !irqs_disabled() test.
> 
> Something isn't right since I'm hitting it hundreds of times on boot.
> 
> -Eric
> 
Ok, let's see if replacing irqs_disabled() to 
in_atomic_preempt_off() helps... 

Regards,
Alex.

View attachment "x.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (417 bytes)