[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090822231457.7139bd00@skybase>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:14:57 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
johnstul@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/core] x86: Do not unregister PIT clocksource on PIT
oneshot setup/shutdown
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:35:41 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> even after this fix, -tip testing found yet another circular locking
> bug, on a 32-bit Core2 laptop:
You got to love lockdep .. another ugly one:
clocksource_register: has clocksource_mutex, get cpu_add_remove_lock
native_cpu_up: has cpu_add_remove_lock, get clocksource_mutex
To register a clocksource the clocksource_mutex is acquired and if
necessary timekeeping_notify is called to install the clocksource as
the timekeeper clock. timekeeping_notify uses stop_machine which needs
to take cpu_add_remove_lock mutex.
Starting a new cpu is done with the cpu_add_remove_lock mutex held.
native_cpu_up checks the tsc of the new cpu and if the tsc is no good
clocksource_change_rating is called. Which needs the clocksource_mutex
and the deadlock is complete.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists