| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-a157229cabd6dd8cfa82525fc9bf730c94cc9ac2@git.kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:02:56 GMT
From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Simplify rcu_pending()/rcu_check_callbacks() API
Commit-ID: a157229cabd6dd8cfa82525fc9bf730c94cc9ac2
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a157229cabd6dd8cfa82525fc9bf730c94cc9ac2
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:56:51 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:32:39 +0200
rcu: Simplify rcu_pending()/rcu_check_callbacks() API
All calls from outside RCU are of the form:
if (rcu_pending(cpu))
rcu_check_callbacks(cpu, user);
This is silly, instead we put a call to rcu_pending() in
rcu_check_callbacks(), and then make the outside calls be to
rcu_check_callbacks(). This cuts down on the code a bit and
also gives the compiler a better chance of optimizing.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Cc: josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dvhltc@...ibm.com
Cc: niv@...ibm.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
LKML-Reference: <125097461311-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/ia64/xen/time.c | 3 +--
include/linux/rcupreempt.h | 1 -
include/linux/rcutree.h | 1 -
kernel/rcupreempt.c | 10 ++++++++--
kernel/rcutree.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/timer.c | 3 +--
6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/xen/time.c b/arch/ia64/xen/time.c
index fb83326..dbeadb9 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/xen/time.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/xen/time.c
@@ -133,8 +133,7 @@ consider_steal_time(unsigned long new_itm)
account_idle_ticks(blocked);
run_local_timers();
- if (rcu_pending(cpu))
- rcu_check_callbacks(cpu, user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
+ rcu_check_callbacks(cpu, user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
scheduler_tick();
run_posix_cpu_timers(p);
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupreempt.h b/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
index 6c9dd9c..aff4772 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ extern void call_rcu_sched(struct rcu_head *head,
extern void __rcu_read_lock(void);
extern void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
-extern int rcu_pending(int cpu);
extern int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu);
#define __rcu_read_lock_bh() { rcu_read_lock(); local_bh_disable(); }
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 8a0222c..c739d90 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
extern void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu);
extern void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu);
-extern int rcu_pending(int cpu);
extern int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu);
static inline void __rcu_read_lock(void)
diff --git a/kernel/rcupreempt.c b/kernel/rcupreempt.c
index 7d777c9..0053ce5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupreempt.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupreempt.c
@@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rcu_dyntick_sched, rcu_dyntick_sched
.dynticks = 1,
};
+static int rcu_pending(int cpu);
+
void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu)
{
struct rcu_dyntick_sched *rdssp = &per_cpu(rcu_dyntick_sched, cpu);
@@ -961,7 +963,10 @@ static void rcu_check_mb(int cpu)
void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
{
unsigned long flags;
- struct rcu_data *rdp = RCU_DATA_CPU(cpu);
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+
+ if (!rcu_pending(cpu))
+ return; /* if nothing for RCU to do. */
/*
* If this CPU took its interrupt from user mode or from the
@@ -976,6 +981,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
* CPUs to happen after any such write.
*/
+ rdp = RCU_DATA_CPU(cpu);
if (user ||
(idle_cpu(cpu) && !in_softirq() &&
hardirq_count() <= (1 << HARDIRQ_SHIFT))) {
@@ -1382,7 +1388,7 @@ int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
rdp->waitschedlist != NULL);
}
-int rcu_pending(int cpu)
+static int rcu_pending(int cpu)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = RCU_DATA_CPU(cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 7c51508..4ce3adc 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ static int qhimark = 10000; /* If this many pending, ignore blimit. */
static int qlowmark = 100; /* Once only this many pending, use blimit. */
static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed);
+static int rcu_pending(int cpu);
/*
* Return the number of RCU-sched batches processed thus far for debug & stats.
@@ -974,6 +975,8 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
*/
void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
{
+ if (!rcu_pending(cpu))
+ return; /* if nothing for RCU to do. */
if (user ||
(idle_cpu(cpu) && rcu_scheduler_active &&
!in_softirq() && hardirq_count() <= (1 << HARDIRQ_SHIFT))) {
@@ -1329,7 +1332,7 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
* by the current CPU, returning 1 if so. This function is part of the
* RCU implementation; it is -not- an exported member of the RCU API.
*/
-int rcu_pending(int cpu)
+static int rcu_pending(int cpu)
{
return __rcu_pending(&rcu_sched_state, &per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu)) ||
__rcu_pending(&rcu_bh_state, &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu));
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index a7f07d5..a3d25f4 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -1156,8 +1156,7 @@ void update_process_times(int user_tick)
/* Note: this timer irq context must be accounted for as well. */
account_process_tick(p, user_tick);
run_local_timers();
- if (rcu_pending(cpu))
- rcu_check_callbacks(cpu, user_tick);
+ rcu_check_callbacks(cpu, user_tick);
printk_tick();
scheduler_tick();
run_posix_cpu_timers(p);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists