[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19088.47213.327897.703458@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:33:01 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, dwalker@...o99.com,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
johnstul@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Increase granularity of
read_persistent_clock()
Ingo Molnar writes:
> * Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > I overlooked a case in the powerpc version of read_persistent_lock.
> > New patch:
>
> the patches are already committed and this patch doesnt apply - mind
> sending a delta fix against tip:master:
Is that going to leave us with a bisection breakage on powerpc once
this stuff goes upstream? If so please fold the fix into the original
patch.
Thanks,
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists