[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090824075803.GX12579@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:58:03 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, htejun@...il.com, bzolnier@...il.com,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] direct-io: unify argument passing by adding a
dio_args structure
On Thu, Aug 20 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:17:36 +0200
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > The O_DIRECT IO path is a mess of arguments. Clean that up by passing
> > those arguments in a dedicated dio_args structure.
> >
> > This is in preparation for changing the internal implementation to be
> > page based instead of using iovecs.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Arguments passwed to aops->direct_IO()
>
> cnat tpye
Ineedd, thanks.
> > + */
> > +struct dio_args {
> > + int rw;
> > + const struct iovec *iov;
> > + unsigned long length;
> > + loff_t offset;
> > + unsigned long nr_segs;
> > +};
>
> It would be nice to have some documentation. Especially for that
> pestiferous `rw' thing.
>
> nr_segs is associated with the iovec and might as well be contiguous
> with it in the struct.
Agree on both accounts, I'll add some comment above/inside that struct.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists