[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090824084935.GT29515@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:49:35 +0200
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/15] x86, sched: Add config option for multi-node CPU
scheduling
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:50:35AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:15:21 +0200, Andreas Herrmann said:
> >
> > I've decided to add this as a subitem of MC scheduling.
> > I think the normal case will be that a multi-node CPU has more than 1
> > core on each of its nodes. Thus using MN scheduling without MC
> > scheduling does not make much sense.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> Is this patch series bisectable? I admit not having checked deeply, and
> at least at first glance the rest looks sane - but usually Kconfig changes
> are kept until the *last* patch so that there's no chance of inter-patch
> dependencies breaking...
It should be bisectable -- i.e. it shouldn't cause build errors.
Furthermore the real usage of MN domains gets activated with
patch 7.
Regards,
Andreas
--
Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
(OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists