[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090824135344.GC4639@cetus.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:53:44 +0200
From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bastian Blank <bastian@...di.eu.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] s390 patches for v2.6.31-rc7
Bastian,
thanks for your feedback.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:15:26PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 09:37:14PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > +static void __init set_preferred_console(void)
> > +{
> > + if (MACHINE_IS_KVM) {
> > + add_preferred_console("hvc", 0, NULL);
> > + s390_virtio_console_init();
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> Why this early return instead of else if as all options are mutually
> exclusive? Also why do you init the virtio console here instead of an
> console_initcall?
This is a bug fix to set the respective preferred console device for
conmode=3270. To make as few changes as possible for -rc7, the console
initialization for kvm has been moved to the new function.
You are right that s390_virtio_console_init() should be called from a
console_initcall(). I started working on another patch to solve this
issue for the next kernel release.
Best regards,
Hendrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists