linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/15] sched: Check for sched_mn_power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1251126220.7538.273.camel@twins>
Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:03:40 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] sched: Check for sched_mn_power_savings when
 doing load balancing

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:41 +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> The patch adds support for POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_BASIC for MN domain
> level. Currently POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP is not used for MN domain.
> 
> (I have to admit that so far I don't have the correct understanding
> what's the benefit of POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP (when an deticated
> wakeup CPU is used) in contrast to POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_BASIC.  I also
> have not found an example that would demonstrate the difference
> between those two powersaving levels.)

blame svaidy for not writing enough comments ;-)

iirc it moves tasks to sched_mv_preferred_wakeup_cpu instead of waking
an idle cpu, this leaves idle cpus idle longer at the cost of creating
overload on other cpus.

> Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched.c |    5 +++--
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index ebcda58..7a0d710 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -4591,7 +4591,8 @@ static int find_new_ilb(int cpu)
>  	 * Have idle load balancer selection from semi-idle packages only
>  	 * when power-aware load balancing is enabled
>  	 */
> -	if (!(sched_smt_power_savings || sched_mc_power_savings))
> +	if (!(sched_smt_power_savings || sched_mc_power_savings ||
> +	      sched_mn_power_savings))
>  		goto out_done;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -4681,7 +4682,7 @@ int select_nohz_load_balancer(int stop_tick)
>  			int new_ilb;
>  
>  			if (!(sched_smt_power_savings ||
> -						sched_mc_power_savings))
> +			      sched_mc_power_savings || sched_mn_power_savings))
>  				return 1;
>  			/*
>  			 * Check to see if there is a more power-efficient
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/