[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251136310.588.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:51:50 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] defer skb allocation in virtio_net -- mergable buff part
Hello Avi,
Thanks for you review. I was on vacation last week.
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 16:47 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Alternatives include:
> - store the link in the page itself
> - have an array of pages per list element instead of just one pointer
> - combine the two, store an array of page pointers in one of the free
> pages
> - use the struct page::lru member
>
> The last is the most traditional and easiest so I'd recommend it
> (though
> it still takes the cacheline hit).
I prefer the combine of the two. But I will compare the performance
differences if no much difference, we can use the easiest one.
> > +static struct page_list *get_a_free_page(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +{
> > + struct page_list *plist;
> > +
> > + if (list_empty(&vi->freed_pages)) {
> > + plist = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page_list), gfp_mask);
> > + if (!plist)
> > + return NULL;
> > + list_add_tail(&plist->list,&vi->freed_pages);
> > + plist->page = alloc_page(gfp_mask);
> >
>
> What if the allocation fails here?
It is handled by the caller.
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists