[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908241503150.7951@makko.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, gleb@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] eventfd: new EFD_STATE flag
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/24/2009 09:25 PM, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > Indeed, the default eventfd behaviour is like, well, an event. Signaling
> > (kernel side) or writing (userspace side), signals the event.
> > Waiting (reading) it, will reset the event.
> > If you use EFD_SEMAPHORE, you get a semaphore-like behavior.
> > Events and sempahores are two widely known and used abstractions.
> > The EFD_STATE proposed one, well, no. Not at all.
> >
>
> There are libraries that provide notifications (or fire watches) when some
> value changes. They're much less frequently used than events or semaphores,
> though.
There are userspace libraries that do almost everything, but you hardly
see things like pthread_(EFD_STATE-like)_create() or similar system
interfaces based on such abstraction.
Is that really difficult to understand where I'm standing, leaving the KVM
hat off for a moment?
- Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists