linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip 1/2] Add "notrace" to RCU function headers used by ftrace.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:38:51 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/2] Add "notrace" to RCU function headers used by
 ftrace.


On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> Both rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace() and rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace()
> are used by ftrace, and thus need to be marked "notrace".  Unfortunately,
> my naive assumption that gcc would see the inner "notrace" does not hold.
> Kudos to Lai Jiangshan for noting this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index ec90fc3..8b4422c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched(void)
>  	__acquire(RCU_SCHED);
>  	rcu_read_acquire();
>  }
> -static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(void)
> +static inline notrace void rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(void)
>  {
>  	preempt_disable_notrace();
>  	__acquire(RCU_SCHED);
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched(void)
>  	__release(RCU_SCHED);
>  	preempt_enable();
>  }
> -static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void)
> +static inline notrace void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void)

Funny, inlines should not be traced. Is gcc ignoring the inlines here?

-- Steve

>  {
>  	rcu_read_release();
>  	__release(RCU_SCHED);
> -- 
> 1.5.2.5
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/