[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A923D98.4090501@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:13:28 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, sam@...nborg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix build with older binutils and consolidate
linker script
On 08/23/2009 11:55 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> 21.08.09 22:23 >>>
>> On 08/18/2009 08:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
>>> #define VSYSCALL_ADDR (-10*1024*1024)
>>> -#define VSYSCALL_PHYS_ADDR ((LOADADDR(.data.read_mostly) + \
>>> - SIZEOF(.data.read_mostly) + 4095) & ~(4095))
>>> -#define VSYSCALL_VIRT_ADDR ((ADDR(.data.read_mostly) + \
>>> - SIZEOF(.data.read_mostly) + 4095) & ~(4095))
>>> +#define VSYSCALL_PHYS_ADDR ((LOADADDR(.data) + SIZEOF(.data) + \
>>> + PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1))
>>> +#define VSYSCALL_VIRT_ADDR ((ADDR(.data) + SIZEOF(.data) + \
>>> + PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1))
>>>
>> I'm missing something with this chunk... could you please explain?
>
> There are two changes here: One is the adjustment to properly use the
> new preceding section's name, and the other is to replace the hard coded
> 4095 by PAGE_SIZE-1.
>
Hm. I'm wondering if an actual (NOLOAD)/@...its section wouldn't be
better...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists