linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 32-bit read from uninitialized memory (f6f6e1a4), by kmemleak's scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1251191507.26351.0.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:11:47 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 32-bit read from uninitialized
 memory  (f6f6e1a4), by kmemleak's scan_block()

On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:03 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> I don't know so much about the kmemleak internals, but this I can say
> about the kmemcheck part: According to your definition, an object is
> initialized if all the bytes of an object are initialized.
> 
> Is it possible that because of this, if we have a partially
> uninitialized object, kmemleak will not record the pointers found in
> that object? If so, it might skip valid pointers, and deem an object
> unreferenced. Which could make kmemleak give false-positives.
> 
> I think it would be better to ask kmemcheck on a per-pointer basis
> (i.e. for each pointer-sized word in the object), whether it is
> initialized or not.

Yeah, makes sense.

			Pekka

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
index 2c55ed0..528bf95 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
@@ -331,6 +331,20 @@ static void kmemcheck_read_strict(struct pt_regs *regs,
 	kmemcheck_shadow_set(shadow, size);
 }
 
+bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size)
+{
+	enum kmemcheck_shadow status;
+	void *shadow;
+
+	shadow = kmemcheck_shadow_lookup(addr);
+	if (!shadow)
+		return true;
+
+	status = kmemcheck_shadow_test(shadow, size);
+
+	return status == KMEMCHECK_SHADOW_INITIALIZED;
+}
+
 /* Access may cross page boundary */
 static void kmemcheck_read(struct pt_regs *regs,
 	unsigned long addr, unsigned int size)
diff --git a/include/linux/kmemcheck.h b/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
index 47b39b7..dc2fd54 100644
--- a/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
+++ b/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ void kmemcheck_mark_initialized_pages(struct page *p, unsigned int n);
 int kmemcheck_show_addr(unsigned long address);
 int kmemcheck_hide_addr(unsigned long address);
 
+bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size);
+
 #else
 #define kmemcheck_enabled 0
 
@@ -99,6 +101,11 @@ static inline void kmemcheck_mark_initialized_pages(struct page *p,
 {
 }
 
+static inline bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_KMEMCHECK */
 
 /*
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index 6debe0d..b075bf0 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/atomic.h>
 
+#include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
 #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
 
 /*
@@ -885,7 +886,8 @@ static void scan_block(void *_start, void *_end,
 
 	for (ptr = start; ptr < end; ptr++) {
 		unsigned long flags;
-		unsigned long pointer = *ptr;
+		unsigned long pointer;
+
 		struct kmemleak_object *object;
 
 		if (allow_resched)
@@ -893,6 +895,13 @@ static void scan_block(void *_start, void *_end,
 		if (scan_should_stop())
 			break;
 
+		/* Don't scan uninitialized memory. */
+		if (!kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized((unsigned long) ptr,
+							sizeof(unsigned long)))
+			continue;
+
+		pointer = *ptr;
+
 		object = find_and_get_object(pointer, 1);
 		if (!object)
 			continue;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/