[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090825135651.GA22484@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:56:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutils and
consolidate linker script
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> 25.08.09 09:50 >>>
> >
> >* tip-bot for Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Commit-ID: ddc98b38b6320d5de2e3167673a06ec1a48e9d0e
> >> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/ddc98b38b6320d5de2e3167673a06ec1a48e9d0e
> >> Author: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
> >> AuthorDate: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:51:27 +0100
> >> Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> >> CommitDate: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:51:35 -0700
> >>
> >> x86: Fix build with older binutils and consolidate linker script
> >
> >this breaks the build with newer binutils:
>
> With the updated patch just submitted I made sure UP and SMP
> builds work as well as building with old and current binutils.
Thanks, applied.
> Sorry for having forgotten to do so before submitting the first
> time (I know I had intended to).
This happens. I'm still unsure whether we can do it in .31.0 or need
to delay it to .31.1 via a -stable backport tag. One more problem
with it and i think we'll need to delay it - it's just too large and
changes too many aspects of the linker script.
Would it be possible to split it into two pieces: 'minimal fix' and
'clean up' portions?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists