[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C501EA9047@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:00:02 -0700
From: "Anirban Sinha" <ASinha@...gmasystems.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Li Zefan" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@...sign.ru>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] : eliminate code duplication in kernel/tracepoint.c
>> I still think it's better not to remove this break. every "case"
>> should have a break or a return, expect for the falling throught
>> cases.
>
>Correct. That might seem like a superfluous statement, but when we
>add new cases it stays robust while with the missing break one can
>create an unintended fall-through codepath.
>
> Ingo
Thanks a lot Li and Ingo for all the feedback. Final patch goes below:
>From f9826874841a5b15b553cfb6540d1ecfa6b55531 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anirban Sinha <asinha@...gmasystems.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:50:54 -0700
Subject: cleanup: eliminate code duplication in kernel/tracepoint.c
Signed-off-by: Anirban Sinha <asinha@...gmasystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/tracepoint.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
index 1ef5d3a..4840ab6 100644
--- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
+++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
@@ -554,9 +554,6 @@ int tracepoint_module_notify(struct notifier_block
*self,
switch (val) {
case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
- tracepoint_update_probe_range(mod->tracepoints,
- mod->tracepoints + mod->num_tracepoints);
- break;
case MODULE_STATE_GOING:
tracepoint_update_probe_range(mod->tracepoints,
mod->tracepoints + mod->num_tracepoints);
--
1.6.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists