lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251209644.3514.0.camel@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:14:04 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	avorontsov@...mvista.com
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ben Dooks <ben@...ff.org>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Device table matching for SPI subsystem

On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:44 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:35:23AM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 04:39 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > > Andrew,
> > > 
> > > This new patch set overwrites following patches:
> > > 
> > >   hwmon-lm70-convert-to-device-table-matching.patch
> > >   hwmon-adxx-convert-to-device-table-matching.patch
> > >   spi-merge-probe-and-probe_id-callbacks.patch
> > >   spi-prefix-modalias-with-spi.patch
> > >   of-remove-stmm25p40-alias.patch
> > >   mtd-m25p80-convert-to-device-table-matching.patch
> > >   spi-add-support-for-device-table-matching.patch
> > 
> > Are you going to send v3 and address David's comments?
> 
> No v3, but I'm going to address David's comments in a follow up
> patch set where I'll change the probing code anyway.
> 
> > Do you want some of these patches to go via the MTD tree or
> > they better go as a series via some other tree?
> 
> Um.. The MTD patches depend on SPI subsystem changes... If
> David and Andrew are OK with SPI patches going through MTD tree,
> then I'm fine with it as well.

If you are not sure, then I suggest to make these go through something
else (not MTD tree).

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ