[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090825144816.GA28026@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:48:16 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older
binutilsandconsolidate linker script
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> 25.08.09 16:14 >>>
> >
> >* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> 25.08.09 15:56 >>>
> >> >Would it be possible to split it into two pieces: 'minimal fix' and
> >> >'clean up' portions?
> >>
> >> Besides being cumbersome, that would make it even larger, so I'd
> >> say that's not worth it.
> >
> >I mean the two patches yield the same end result. The first one
>
> I also understood it that way.
>
> >(which is smaller, hopefully) gets committed to x86/urgent, the
> >second one (the cleanups and other non-essentials) gets pushed
> >upstream in .32.
>
> The cleanup part really isn't much more than what I described with
> "Once touching this code, also use the various data section helper
> macros from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h.", and if the first
> patch wouldn't use those macros, it would just grow and become
> even less readable.
fair enough. Lets hope it all goes fine.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists