lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090825171716.GC6456@localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:17:16 -0700
From:	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shai@...lex86.org,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: 2.6.31-rc7 crash due to buggy flat_phys_pkg_id

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:12:01PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 04:53:45PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
>>>> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>>>>
>>>
>> 
>> Why?  The specs seem to indicate otherwise unless I am mistaken --
>> Intel  systems programming guide, Vol 3A Part1, chapter 7 section
>> 7.5.5 - Identifying Logical Processors in a MP system:
>> <quote>
>> After the BIOS has completed the MP initialization protocol, each logical
>> processor can be uniquely identified by its local APIC ID. Software can
>> access these APIC IDs in either of the following ways
>> </quote>
>> phys_pkg_id() indicates that the logical package id is being looked up,
>> so local apic id should be used here no?
>> What am I missing?
>
>initial apic id : it can not changed, there is fixed mapping from that to physical processor id aka socket id / node id.
>
>apic id: could be changed by BIOS to any value. there is no good way to get phys_pkg_id from that.
>

But BIOS is supposed to change it to a sane value.  Until 2.6.30, local apic
id has been used to get phys_pkg_id for the 'flat' apics!  What changed?  Was
this changed for a BIOS bug?  Even the intel books seem to indicate local
apic usage!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ